Confucius’s views on administration and communication
Abstract
This article analyzes the formation of theoretical views on the nature, methods, and practice of the administrative and communication activities of public authorities in relation to the people of the state in the VI‒V centuries BC in Ancient China. Communication ideas are identified, first of all, on the basis of analysis of Confucius’ Lun Yu treatise. The adopted method of study here is a systemic approach and comparative historical analysis, allowing us to identify the elements associated with the views of the thinker and determine their significance in the history of the theory of administration and communication in Chinese documents. It shows the conditions of the political and economic life of Ancient China at that time, which promoted the emergence of the philosophical Confucian concepts of public administration and communication. It establishes the sequence and distinctive feature of the humanistic and moral, and ethical views of Confucius on the functioning of the communication models of a state, which are still relevant for the development of science and practice. The focus of the work is on the analysis of specific judgments of the thinker about the structure of communication in the administrative environment. It reveals the communicative content of the key elements of the cornerstone concept of his teachings ‒ Tao. The work considers the reasons for the propaganda of closed government and dosed information flows in the administrative field and in the communication of public officials with the masses. It analyzes the means proposed to make people (subjects) make proper decisions for the authorities in power. This task is still actively discussed in modern communication science. It also interprets some of Confucius’ statements that determine the moral and ethical framework of administrative communication and reveals the meaning of his communication model. It identifies the features of that ideal fragmented communication model as a sample limited for practical use by numerous objective conditions. It also specifies the time frame of the “Axial Age” in China’s history. And finally, it makes conclusions about the role and significance of Confucius’s views in the formation and development of the methods and ethics of communicative action in public administration in the historical and perspective aspects.
Downloads
References
Bekh Yu., & Slieptsov A. (2012). Filosofski problemy suchasnoho upravlinnia skladnymy systemamy: idei, pryntsypy i modeli [Philosophical problems of modern management of complex systems: ideas, principles and models]. Kyiv: NPU Retrieved from https://bvp.fmon.npu.edu.ua/images/Y_V_Bekh_Slepcov.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Bukhtatyi, O. (2018). Publichni komunikatsii demokratychnoi derzhavy [Public communications of a democratic state]. Dnipro: Zhurfond [in Ukrainian].
Cline, E. M. (2007). Two senses of justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy. Dao, 6(4), 361‒381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9021-1
Cua, A. S. (1971). Reflections on the structure of Confucian ethics. Philosophy East and West, 21(2), 125‒140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1397781
Dussel, E. D., & Apel, K.-O. (2005). Ética del discurso y ética de la liberación [Ethics of discourse and ethics of liberation]. Madrid : Trotta. Retrieved from https://enriquedussel.com/txt/Textos_Obras_Selectas/(F)21.Etica_Discurso_Etica_Liberacion.pdf [in Spanish].
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press. Retrieved from https://teddykw2.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/jurgen-habermas-theory-of-communicative-action-volume-1.pdf
Habermas, J. (1996). Komunikatyvna diia i dyskurs – dvi formy povsiakdennoi komunikatsii [Communicative action and discourse are two forms of everyday communication]. Pershodzherela komunikatyvnoi filosofii – Primary sources of communicative philosophy (pp. 84-90). Kyiv: Lybid Retrieved from https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Habermas_Jurgen/Komunikatyvna_dia_i_dyskurs/ [in Ukrainian].
Hu, Shi. (1919). Chzhungo chzhesyue shi dagan (Ocherk istorii kitajskoj filosofii) [Zhongguo zhexue shi dagan (Essay on the history of Chinese philosophy)]. Shanhaj: Shan"u in'shuguan' [in Chinese].
Jaspers, К. (2017). Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte [The origin and goal of history]. Basel: Schwabe Verlag. https://doi.org/10.24894/978-3-7965-4059-2 [in German].
Konfutsii. (2018). Vyslovy [Expressions]. Kharkiv: Folio. Retrieved from https://chtivo.org.ua/uploads/posts/files/3/3/1/3/4/33134.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Kretov, P. V., & Kretova, O. I. (2021). Postneokonfutsianstvo i hlobalizm: koreliatsiia filosofii ta ideolohii u suchasnomu Kytai [Post-Neo-Confucianism and Globalism: The Correlation of Philosophy and Ideology in modern China]. Kytaieznavchi doslidzhennia – Chinese Studies, 2, 7‒18. https://doi.org/10.51198/chinesest2021.02.007 [in Ukrainian].
Lao-Tszy. (2022). Dao De Tszin. Knyha pro shliakh ta sylu [Tao Te Ching. The book about the path and strength]. Kyiv: Arii. Retrieved from https://book-ye.com.ua/seo/catalog/filosofiya/dao-de-tszin-knyha-pro-shlyakh-ta-sylu/ [in Ukrainian].
Liu, JeeLoo. (2007). Confucian Moral Realism. Asian Philosophy, 17(2), 167‒184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552360701445109
Luj, Czyain'. (2021). Politicheskie mysli Konfuciya v “Lun' YUe” [Political thoughts of Confucius in “Lun Yue”]. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel'skij zhurnal – International research journal, 12(114), Part 4, 9‒13 https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.114.12.117 [in Russian].
Ostapets, Yu. (2011). Konfutsii [Confucius]. Politychna entsyklopediia – The Political Encyclopedia (pp. 363‒364). Kyiv: Parlamentske vydavnytstvo. Retrieved from https://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Levenets_Yurii/Politychna_entsyklopediia.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (2020). Oxford Classical Texts: Aristotelis: Ars Rhetorica. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198145578.book.1
Si, Tszinpin. (2021). Pro derzhavne upravlinnia v Kytai. Tom 1. [About public administration in China]. (Vol. 1). Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Sterckx, R. (2019a). Ways of Heaven: an Introduction to Chinese Thought.
New York: Basic Books.
Sterckx, R. (2019b). Chinese thought: from Confucius to Cook Ding. London, UK: Penguin. Random House. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/58263706/Book_Review_Chinese_thought_from_Confucius_to_Cook_Ding_2019_by_Roel_Sterckx
Vasylevska, T. E., Salamatov, V. O., & Marushevskyi, H. B. (2015). Etyka derzhavnoho upravlinnia [Ethics of public administration]. Kyiv: NADU. Retrieved from https://ktpu.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Etika-derzhavnogo-sluzhbovtsya.pdf [in Ukrainian].
White, S. (Ed.). (2021). Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers: An Edited Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139047111
Xiao, Gongquan. (2016). A History of Chinese Political Thought. Vol. 1. From the Beginnings to the Sixth Century, A. D. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Yu, Jiyuan. (1998). Virtue: Confucius and Aristotle. Philosophy East and West, 48(2), 323‒347. https://doi.org/10.2307/1399830
Yu, Jiyuan. (2005). The Beginnings of Ethics: Confucius and Socrates. Asian Philosophy, 15(2), 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552360500165304
Yu, Jiyuan. (2008). The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2008.00513.x
Abstract views: 861 PDF Downloads: 703
Copyright (c) 2023 History of science and technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License terms: authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
The scanned copy of the "Agreement” on the authors" copyright transfer on the manuscript publication and the subsequent posting of the paper on the Internet (in * .pdf or * .jpg format) is to be attached to the manuscript of the paper.
By this agreement the author certifies that the submitted material:
- does not infringe the copyright of other persons or organizations;
- was not previously published in other publishing houses and has not been submitted for publication in other editions.
The author passes the editorial board of the journal "History of science and technology" rights to:
- publication of the article in Ukrainian (English and Russian) language and distribution of its printed copy;
- translation of the article into English language (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian language) and distribution of its translated printed copy;
- distribution of the article electronic copy, as well as electronic copy of the article English translation (for articles in Ukrainian and Russian), via any electronic means (placing on the official web-site of the journal, electronic databases, repositories, etc.) printed copy of the translation.
The author reserves the right without the consent of the editorial board and founders:
- Use the materials of the article in whole or in part for educational purposes.
- Use the materials of the article in whole or in part to write their own dissertations.
- Use the materials of the article for the preparation of abstracts, conference reports, as well as oral presentations.
- Place electronic copies of the article (including the final electronic copy downloaded from the official web-site of the journal) to:
- personal web-resources of all authors (web-sites, web-pages, blogs, etc.);
- web-resources of institutions where authors work (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-commercial web-resources of open access (for example, arXiv.org).
In all cases, the availability of a bibliographic link to an article or hyperlink to its electronic copy on the official website of the journal is compulsory.
