Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere and its reflection in ethical and moral values of society

Keywords: biosphere, noosphere, co-evolution, scientific thinking, ethics

Abstract

The paper assesses the topicality of Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere, coined over almost twenty years starting in the early 20th century. Emphasizing the uniqueness of Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere as the transformation of the biosphere by a man using reason, we concentrate on the assessment of the utopian or realistic nature of his vision of the future of humanity. Based on the philosophical case-studies analysis, it identifies the ideological roots of the noosphere concept, the development of views on the concept in time, the role of reason and scientific thinking, the opinions of its supporters and critics, and Moiseev's related concept of co-evolution. We point out the correlation between Vernadsky's concept of the noosphere and Moiseev's bifurcation and his two imperatives as necessary conditions for the co-evolution of nature and man. We document that Vernadský did not only think about the positive role of reason in the creation and development of the noosphere, but he was also aware of the possibility of its misuse. We compare Vernadsky's idea of the collective reason creation with Kurzweil's concept of technological singularity, Crutzen's concept of the Anthropocene, Haff's concept of the technosphere and Cer's scenario of the possible future development towards the creation of tech subjects and the replacement of the biosphere with the technosphere. We also assess the possibility of approximating essential concept-forming elements, i.e. philosophical categories, collective reason, the collective intelligence of humanity, and scientific knowledge facilitated by information and communication technology. Ultimately, conclusions concerning the topicality of Vernadsky's concept of noosphere are formulated. We argue that Vernadský's concept of the noosphere is timeless and should be taken not as a utopia but, on the contrary, as a scenario of possible development along the line of geosphere – biosphere – noosphere, prospectively with its transfer to the cosmic dimension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bondareva, Ja. V., Semaeva, I. I. & Moisejkina, T. A. (2018). Ontologicheskie iskanija v russkoj religioznoj filosofii XIX – pervoj poloviny XX centuries. [Ontological searches in Russian religious philosophy of the 19th century – the first half of the 20th century]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofskie nauki ‒ Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Philosophy, (4), 49‒58. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2018-4-49-58 [in Russian].

Borejko, V. E. (2013). Proryv v jekologicheskuju jetiku [Breakthrough in environmental ethics]. Kiev: KJeKC [in Russian].

Borejko, V. E. (2001). N. F. Rejmers kak verujushhij jekolog [N. F. Reimers as a faithful ecologist]. Gumanitarnyj jekologicheskij zhurnal ‒ Journal of Humanitarian Ecology, 3(2), 9‒12. Retrieved from http://aetos.kiev.ua/pdf/hem/hem32.pdf [in Russian].

Cera, A. (2017). The Technocene or Technology as (Neo)Environment. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21(2/3), 243‒281. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne201710472.

Fesenkova, L. V. (2013). Mirovozzrencheskie i estestvonauchnye osnovanija idei noosfery. Filosofskie idei V. I. Vernadskogo i sovremennost [Worldview and natural-science foundations of the idea of the noosphere. Philosophical ideas of V. I. Vernadsky and modernity]. Moscow : Tehnetika [in Russian].

Fesenkova, L. V. (2018). Utopizm v sovremennyh predstavlenijah o mire: koncepcija noosfery [Utopianism in modern ideas about the world: the concept of the noosphere]. Nauchno-informacionnyj zhurnal. Kulturnoe nasledie Rossii ‒Scientific and informational journal. Cultural Heritage of Russia, (4), 9‒15 [in Russian].

Fesenkova, L. V. (2019). Noosfernoe budushhee chelovechestva: nauchnoe predvidenie ili kvazinauchnyj mif? [Noosphere future of the Humanity: scientific forecast or quasi-scientific myth?]. Chelovek – Man, 30(1), 66‒74. https://doi.org/10.31857/S023620070003022-1 [in Russian].

Floridi, L. (2019). Čtvrtá revoluce [Fourth revolution]. Praha. Karolinum [in Czech].

Fuchs-Kittowski, K. & Krüger, P. (1997). The noosphere vision of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Vladimir I. Vernadsky in the perspective of information and of world‐wide communication. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 50(1‒4), 757‒784. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1997.9972669

Gorshkov, V. G. (1996). Zapasy i potoky informacii v biote i civilizacii [Stocks and flows of information in biota and civilization]. Doklady Akademii nauk ‒ Reports of the Academy of Sciences, 350(1), 135‒138 [in Russian].

Griffen, L., Ryzheva, N., Nefodov, D. & Hryashchevskaya, L. (2022). Some methodological issues of the history of science and technology. History of Science and Technology, 12(1), 31‒54. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-1-31-54.

Grinevald, J. & Rispoli, G. (2018). Vladimir Vernadsky and the Co-evolution of the Biosphere, the Noosphere, and the Technosphere. Technosphere Magazine, 20. Retrieved from https://technosphere-magazine.hkw.de/p/Vladimir-Vernadsky-and-the-Co-evolution-of-the-Biosphere-the-Noosphere-and-the-Technosphere-nuJGbW9KPxrREPxXxz95hr.

Haff, P. (2014). Humans and technology in the Anthropocene: Six rules. The Anthropocene Review, 1(2), 126‒136. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614530575.

Hamilton, C. & Grinevald, J. (2015). Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 1‒14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614567155.

Heidegger, M. (1997). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. NewYork & London : Garland.

Krichevsky, S. (2017). A management concept of the technosphere's evolution. Philosophy and Cosmology, 18, 153‒164. Retrieved from http://ispcjournal.org/journals/2017/Krichevsky_Philosophy_and_Cosmology_vol_18.pdf.

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York : Viking.

Kutyrev, V. A. (1990). Utopicheskoe i real'noe v uchenii o noosfere [Utopian and real in the doctrine of the noosphere]. Priroda ‒ Nature, (11), 3‒10 [in Russian].

Kutyrev, V. A. (1996). Naskol'ko razumna Sfera Razuma? [How Reasonable Is the Sphere of Mind?]. Filosofija biologii: vchera, segodnja, zavtra. Pamjati R. S. Karpinskoj ‒ Philosophy of Biology: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. In memory of R.S. Karpinskaya (pp. 148‒157). Moscow : Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk, Institut filosofii [in Russian].

Levit, G. S. (2000). The biosphere and the noosphere theories of V. I. Vernadsky and P. Teilhard de Chardin: A methodological essay. Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 50(144), 160‒176.

Levit, G. S. (2000a). Kriticheskij vzgljad na noosferu V. I. Vernadskogo [Critical view of the noosphere V. I. Vernadsky]. Priroda ‒ Nature, (5), 71‒76 [in Russian].

Liseev, I. K. (2020). V. I. Vernadsky: ot edinstva znanija k carstvu razuma (civilizacionnye motivy) [V. I. Vernadsky: from the unity of knowledge to the realm of reason (civilizational patterns)]. Problemy civilizacionnogo razvitija ‒ Civilization studies review, 2(1), 20‒34. https://doi.org/10.21146/2713-1483-2020-2-1-20-34 [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. & Frolov, I. T. (1984). Vysokoe soprikosnovenie: obshhestvo, chelovek I priroda v vek mikrojelektroniki, informatiki i biotehniki [High contact: society, man and nature in the age of microelectronics, computer science and biotechnology]. Voprosy filosofii ‒ Questions of Philosophy, (9), 24‒41 [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. (1990). Byt' ili ne byt'... chelovechestvu? [To be or not to be... for mankind?]. Moscow : Ul'janovskij Dom pechati [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. (1990a). Chelovek i noosfera [Man and noosphere]. Moscow : Molodaja gvardija [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. (1993). Voshozhdenie k razumu. Lekcii po universal'nomu evoljucionizmu i ego prilozhenijam [Rise to the mind. Lectures on universal evolutionism and its applications]. Moscow : Aspekt Press [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. (1995). Sovremennyj racionalizm [Modern Rationalism]. Moscow : MGVP KOKS [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. (2000). Sud'ba civilizacii. Put' razuma, Jazyki rus. kul'tury [The fate of civilization. Way of reason, Languages Rus. Culture]. Moscow : MGVP KOKS [in Russian].

Moiseev, N. N. (2001). Universum. Informacija [Universe. Information]. Moscow : Obshhestvo, Ustojchivyj Mir [in Russian].

Nazarov, A. G. (2008). Kosmizm v idee noosfery V. I. Vernadskogo [cosmism in the idea of the noosphere by V. I. Vernadsky]. Vestnik Mezhdunarodnoj akademii nauk (Russkaja sekcija) ‒ Bulletin of the International Academy of Sciences (Russian Section), (1), 73‒76 [in Russian].

Oldfield, J. D. & Shaw, D. J. B. (2013). V. I. Vernadskii and the development of biogeochemical understandings of the biosphere, c.1880s–1968. British Society for the History of Science, 46(2), 287‒310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087412000015.

Palagin, A. V., Kurgaev, A. F. & Schevchenko, A. I. (2017). The noosphere paradigm of the development of science and artificial intelligence. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 53(4), 503‒511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-017-9952-4.

Plotnikova, L. I. (2004). Uchenie o noosfere kak ideal'nyj proekt garmonizacii socioprirodnogo vzaimodejstvija [The doctrine of the noosphere as an ideal project for the harmonization of socio-natural interaction] (Doctoral dissertation thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dslib.net/soc-filosofia/uchenie-o-noosfere-kak-idealnyj-proekt-garmonizacii-socioprirodnogo.html [in Russian].

Popkova, N. V. (2014). Antropologiya tekhniki [Anthropology of technology]. Moscow : Stanovlenie, Librokom [in Russian].

Popper, K. R. (2000). Jevoljucionnaja jepistemologija, Jevoljucionnaja jepistemologija i logika social'nyh nauk: Karl Popper i ego kritiki [Evolutionary epistemology, Evolutionary epistemology and the logic of the social sciences: Karl Popper and his critics] (pp. 57‒74). Moscow : Jeditorial URSS [in Russian].

Popper, K. R. (2002). Objektivnoe znanie. Jevoljucionnyj podhod [Objective knowledge. Evolutionary Approach]. Moscow : Jeditorial URSS. [in Russian].

Pozdnyakov, A. V. (2003). Dobrymi namerenijami mostitsja doroga v ad [Good intentions pave the road to hell]. Biosfera ‒ Biosphere, (3), 10‒14 [in Russian].

Ronfeldt, D. & Arquilla, J. (2018). The continuing promise of the noosphere and noopolitik: 20 years after. In Nancy Snow, Nicholas J. Cull (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (pp. 445‒480). New York : Routledge. https://doi.org.10.2139/ssrn.3259425.

Sulejmenov, I. Je. et al. (2013). Nektorye dokazatelstva zavershenija pervogo jetapa noosfernoj revolucii v sovremennom obshhestve, Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacional'nogo universiteta imeni V. I. Vernadskogo [Some evidence of the completion of the first stage of the noospheric revolution in modern society, Scientific notes of the Tauride National University named after V. I. Vernadsky]. Serija Filosofija. Kul'turologija. Politologija. Sociologija ‒ Philosophy Series. Culturology. Political science. Sociology, 26(5), 87‒97 [in Russian].

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J. & McNeil, J. R. (2007). The anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614‒621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2.

Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1987). Fenomen cheloveka [Phenomenon of man]. Moscow : Nauka [in Russian].

Tegmark, M. (2020). Život 3.0. Člověk v éře umělé intelligence [Life 3.0. Man in the era of artificial intelligence]. Prague : Argo/Dokořán [in Czech].

Trubetskova, I. (2010). From biosphere to noosphere: Vladimir Vernadsky's theoretical system as a conceptual framework for universal sustainability education (Doctoral dissertation thesis). Retrieved from https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1611&context=dissertation.

Ursul, A. D. (2014). Na puti k noosfernoj civilizacii: vzaimosv jaz' civilizacionnyh i noosfernyh issledovanij [Towards a noospheric civilization: the relationship between civilizational and noospheric studies]. Politika i obshhestvo ‒ Politics and Society, 12(120), 1501‒1520 [in Russian].

Ursul, A. D. & Ursul, T. A. (2015). Noosferogenez kak global'no-jevoljucionnyj process [Noospherogenesis as a global evolutionary process]. Filosofskaja mysl' ‒ Philosophical Thought, (1), 9‒92. https://doi.org/10.7256/2409-8728.2015.1.14365 [in Russian].

Ursul, A. D. & Ursul, T. A. (2020). On the path to space mining and a cosmic sustainable way of socio-natural interaction. Philosophy and Cosmology, 25, 69‒77. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/25/6.

Vernadsky, V. I. (1926). Biosfera [Biosphere]. Leningrad : NHTI. [in Russian].

Vernadsky, V. I. (1944). Problems of biogeochemistry, the fundamental matter-energy difference between the living and the inert natural bodies of the biosphere. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, 35, 483‒517.

Vernadsky, V. I. (1945). The Biosphere and the Noosphere. American Scientist, 33(1), 1‒12. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/5/59/Vernadsky_WI_1945_The_Biosphere_and_the_Noosphere.pdf.

Vernadsky, V. I. (1965). Himicheskoe stroenie biosfery Zemli i a jej okruzhenije [Chemical structure of the Earth's biosphere and its environment]. Moscow : Nauka [in Russian].

Vernadsky, V. I. (1988). Filosofskie mysli naturalista [Philosophical thoughts of a naturalist]. Moscow : Nauka [in Russian].

Vernadsky, V. I. (1993). Avtotrofnost' chelovechestva, S. Semenova (ed.), Russkij kosmizm: Antologija filosofskoj mysli [Autotrophy of Humanity, S. Semenova (ed.), Russian Cosmism: An Anthology of Philosophical Thought] (pp. 288‒303). Moscow : Pedagogika-press [in Russian].

Vernadsky V. I. (2000). Pro et Contra. Antologija literatury o V. I. Vernadskom za sto let (1898‒1998), Pod obshhej redakciej akademika RAN A. L. Janshina [Pro et Contra. Anthology of literature about V. I. Vernadsky for a hundred years (1898‒1998), Under the general editorship of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences A. L. Yanshin. St. Petersburg]. Sankt-Peterburg : Izdatel'stvo Russkogo Hristianskogo gumanitarnogo instituta [in Russian].

Vernadsky, V. I. (2004). Nauchnaja mysl' kak planetnoe javlenie, BIOSFERA I NOOSFERA [Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon, BIOSPHERE AND NOOSPHERE]. Moscow : AJRIS – PRESS. [in Russian].

Vernadsky, V. I. (2004a). Neskol'ko slov o noosfere, BIOSFERA I NOOSFERA [A few words about the noosphere, BIOSPHERE AND NOOSPHERE]. Moscow : AJRIS – PRESS. [in Russian].

Viner, D. R. (1995). Jekologicheskaja ideologija bez mifov [Ecological ideology without myths]. Voprosy filosofii ‒ Questions of Philosophy, (5), 82‒97 [in Russian].

Zavarzin, G. A. (2010). Kakosfera, Filosofija i publicistika [Kakosfera, Philosophy and journalism]. Moscow : Ruthenica [in Russian].


Abstract views: 110
PDF Downloads: 133
Published
2022-12-16
How to Cite
Jasečková, G., Konvit, M., & Vartiak, L. (2022). Vernadsky’s concept of the noosphere and its reflection in ethical and moral values of society. History of Science and Technology, 12(2), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-2-231-248