French sinology development (13‒21 centuries): historical aspect

  • Tetiana Chubina Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of National University of Civil Defense of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9383-3604
  • Yanina Fedorenko Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of National University of Civil Defense of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-0705
  • Alina Kryshtal Cherkasy Institute of Fire Safety named after Chornobyl Heroes of National University of Civil Defense of Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1818-6603
Keywords: China, history of science, protosinology, missionary sinology, academic sinology, multidisciplinary approach

Abstract

French sinology takes a special place in the history of the sinological studies development. It was France that became the first country where the transformation of missionary sinology, which was common among a limited circle of researchers (mainly in a religious sphere), into the academic scientific discipline, which had already been taught and studied at a professional level in academic institutions, occurred. The Parisian type of sinology used to dominate the entire world for a long time, including such powerful centers of Chinese studies as Germany, Great Britain, the USA, and China itself. The conducted historiographical analysis of the topic allows pointing out the insufficient coverage by the local researchers of the evolution of French sinology historical development as a whole process that had lasted for almost 800 years. This fact prompted the authors to reveal the mentioned topic. The purpose of the article is to investigate the historical development of French sinology during the 13th–21st centuries. In the course of the work, both general scientific methods and special ones were used, among which the priority was given to historical, chronological and problem-thematic methods. The analytical method and methods of grouping and typology were also applied, that made it possible to present the material in a logically complete manner. In order to form a complete picture of sinology development in France, the authors singled out and analyzed three historical periods covering the entire history of Chinese studies development, starting from its birth and flourishment to the process of stagnation. Thus, within the time limits of the first period, the process a peculiar scientific base of knowledge about China accumulating, as well as the development of missionary sinology, was investigated, and it was proved that it became a kind of bridge between the protosinological stage and academic sinology, which secularized the achievements of its predecessors in the 19th century and turned into a scientific academic discipline. Within the time limits of the second period, the scientific achievements of a whole galaxy of French scholars were analyzed, namely, Edouard Chavannes, Marcel Granet, Henri Paul Gaston Maspero, and others, and it was concluded that the Sinological school in France was at the peak of its development, and the views of its representatives gained priority among sinologists all over the world. Regarding the third period, the authors express the opinion that modern French sinology has lost its leading position in the scientific world, and the search for the latest methodological approaches and methods (primarily multidisciplinary with the use of digital technologies) is primarily an attempt to achieve parity with the leading centers of Chinese studies. Factual research material can be used for further study of the history of sinology development, as well as for writing generalising papers on Chinese studies, reading lecture courses, special courses and special seminars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bastid‐Bruguière, M. (2008). Current trends in Chinese studies in France. Journal of Modern Chinese History, 2(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535650802048215.

Bastid-Bruguière, M. (2017). Liberty and Responsibility. Diogenes, 64(1‒2), 25‒28. https://doi.org/10.1177/03921921221080808.

Chavannes, E. (2018). Voyages des pèlerins bouddhistes. L’Itinéraire d’Ou-K’ong, 751–790 [Journeys of Buddhist Pilgrims. The Ou-K’ong Route, 751–790]. Paris: Hachette livre-bnf [in French].

Chavannes, E. (2018). Le t’Ai Chan: Essai de Monographie d’un CulteChinois; Appendice, le Dieu du Sol dans la Chine Antique [The t’Ai Chan: The Essay Monography of Chinese Cult; Appendix, the God of Soil in Ancient China]. Paris: Forgotten Books [in French].

Chemla, К. (2012) Reading proofs in Chinese commentaries: algebraic proofs in an algorithmic context. The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions. New York: Cambridge University Press [in French].

DuHalde, J.-B. (1735). Description géographique, historique, chronologique, politiqueet physique de l’Empire de la Chine et de la Tartarie chinoise. [Geographical, historical, chronological, political and physical description of the Empire of China and Chinese Tartary]. Vol. 2. Paris: P.-G. Le Mercier. Retrieved from https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k56991284/f67.item. texteImage [in French].

Granet, М. (2013). La Civilisation Chinoise [Chinese Civilization]. Paris: Ink book [in French].

Granet, М. (1982). Fêtes et Chansons Anciennes de la Chine [Festivals and Ancient Songs of China]. Paris: Albin Michel [in French].

Granet, М. (1999). La Pensée Chinoise [Chinese Thought]. Paris: Albin Michel [in French].

Gernet, J. (1995). History of Chinese Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Guiheux, G. (2002). Les grands entrepreneurs privés à Taiwan, la main visible de la prospérité. Paris: CNRS editions [in French].

Guiheux, G. (2013). Chinese socialist heroes. In E. Florence, & P. Defraigne (Eds.), Towards a New Development Paradigm in Twenty-First Century China. Economy, Society and Politics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095416.

Jami, С.(2018). Western learning and imperial knowledge of the world during the Кangxi reign (1662–1722). In L. Saraiva, & C. Jami (Eds.), History of Mathematical Sciences: Portugal and East Asia V. Visual and Textual Representations in Exchanges Between Europe and East Asia 16th–18th Centuries (pp. 267‒277). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/ 9789813233256_0012.

Jami, С. (2014). The Jesuits’ Negotiation of Science between France and China (1685–1722): Knowledge and Modes of Imperial Expansion. In: Kontler, L., Romano, A., Sebastiani, S., Török, B.Z. (Eds.), Negotiating Knowledge in Early Modern Empires. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137484017_3.

Jullien F. (2000). Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece. New York: Zone books.

Henriot, Сh. (2020). Modern Chinese History in France: A critical appraisal. Elites, Networks and Power in modern China. Retrieved from https://enepchina.hypotheses.org/2965.

Henriot, Сh. (2016). Scythe and the City: A Social History of Death in Shanghai. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Henriot, Сh. (2001). Prostitution and Sexuality in Shanghai: A Social History, 1849–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kapranov, S. V. (2021). Doslidzhennia “Dao De Tszinu” v Yevropi v pershii polovyni XiX st. [The studies of Tao Te Ching in Europe in the first half of the XIX century]. Kytaieznavchi doslidzhennia ‒ Chinese Studies, (2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.51198/chinesest2020.02.005 [in Ukrainian].

Kim, S. (2004). Strange names of God. The missionary translation of the divine name and the Chinese responses to Matteo Ricci's “Shangti” in Late Ming China, 1583–1644. New York: Peter Lang.

Kiktenko, V. (2017). Dystsyplinarni ta metodolohichni osoblyvosti nauky pro Kytay̆. [Disciplinary and methodological characteristics of science about China]. Skhidnyi svit ‒ The World of the Orient, (4), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.15407/orientw2017.04.046 [in Ukrainian].

Lakutiur, Zh. (2012). Yezuity. Tom 1. Zavoiovnyky [Jesuits. Vol. 1: The Conquerors]. Lviv: Svichado [in Ukrainian].

Maspero, H. (1950). Mélanges posthumes sur les religions et l'histoire de la Chine. Paris: Civilisations du Sud [in French].

Pan, Feng-Chuan (2020). Some reflections on the methodology of the studies on missionary Sinology. Journal of Oriental Studies, 68(2), 423‒438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.2020.1831251.

Rubruck, W. (2010). The Journey of William of Rubruck to the Eastern Parts of the World, 1253-55. London: Hakluyt Society. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315556420.

Trigautio, N. (1615). De christiana expeditione apud Sinas suscepta ab Socjetate Jesu. Ex P. Matthaei Ricij eiusdem Societatis Commentarijs. [About christian expeditions to China undertaken by the Society of Jesus according to Matteo Ricci commentaries]. Augsburg: Christoph Mang. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ita-bnc-mag-00002831-001/page/64/mode/2up [in Latin].

Will, P.-E., & Zink, M. (Eds.). (2020). Jean-Pierre Abel-Remusat et ses successeurs. Deux cents ans de sinologie francaise en France et en Chine [Jean-Pierre Abel-Remusat and his successors. Two hundred years of french sinology in France and China]. Раris: Peeters Pub & Booksellers [in French].


Abstract views: 197
PDF Downloads: 136
Published
2022-12-16
How to Cite
Chubina, T., Fedorenko, Y., & Kryshtal, A. (2022). French sinology development (13‒21 centuries): historical aspect. History of Science and Technology, 12(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-2-197-209