The movement into cinema as a stage in the cinema development

  • Yaroslava Toporivska Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
  • Nataliya Dyadyukh-Bogatko Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • Lyudmila Belinska Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
  • Nataliia Balan Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
  • Liliia Patsaliuk Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
Keywords: art, culture, visual art, photography, frame, animation

Abstract

The development of moving images is a multi-layered abstraction of movement in visual space, based on optical, mechanical, photographic and theoretical innovations. Each stage contributed to the creation of modern cinema in its technical and conceptual forms. The main aim of this study is to identify and analyze how scientific and technical discoveries in the fields of optics, physiology of vision, mechanics and chemistry became the basis for the emergence of a new art form – cinema, and also to show how the interaction of science, technology, culture and society contributed to the formation of a completely new system of visual thinking and mass communication. The article analyzes the history of the emergence of moving images – from optical toys of the 19th century to modern digital cinema. The emphasis is on technical, psychophysiological and technological development, as well as on modern directions that continue the evolution. The ideal “frame–interval–frame” (blackout, break) was a breakthrough in the 19th century, but it was digital technologies that gave freedom to the narrative, mixing frames in real time, adding intellectual processing and visual effects. The subject of the study was the study of the formation of scientific, technical and cultural prerequisites that led to the emergence of cinematography as a result of the evolution of knowledge about visual perception and technologies for fixing and reproducing dynamic images. Particular attention was focused on research in the field of physiology of vision, in particular on the phenomenon of persistence of visual image, which explained the illusion of movement between individual frames. The influence of technical achievements on the development of optical devices that simulated image movement, as well as the analysis of experiments with chronography, was considered. The study paid special attention to the invention of recording and projection devices. All this was considered in the context of socio-cultural and commercial processes, such as the emergence of cinemas, fair screenings, and the formation of cinema as a public spectacle. Thus, the subject of the study is not only the technical inventions themselves, but also the deeper processes of interaction of science, technology and culture, which together led to the emergence of a new means of mass communication – cinema.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alforova, Z., Marchenko, S., Shevchuk, Y., Kotlyar, S., & Honcharuk, S. (2021). Contemporary Ukrainian cinema into the European context (2014-2019). Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S2), 274-283. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS2.1345

Anderson, J., & Anderson, B. (1980). Motion perception in motion pictures. In T. De Lauretis, & S. Heath (Eds.), The Cinematic Apparatus (pp. 76-95). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16401-1_7

Ayres, R. U. (2021). Photography and Movies. In The History and Future of Technology: Can Technology Save Humanity from Extinction? (pp. 397-423). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71393-5_17

Barnouw, E. (1981). The Magician and the Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press.

Benis, R. (2023). Acts of reading: The demands on screenplay reading. In R. Davies, P. Russo, & C. Tieber (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Screenwriting Studies (pp. 93-109). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20769-3_5

Bieberstein, R., & Feyersinger, E. (2022). The ever-expanding scope of animation historiography: A discussion of interdisciplinary approaches and methods. Animation, 17(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/17468477221080108

Biltereyst, D., Maltby, R., & Meers, P. (2019). Introduction: the scope of new cinema history. In D. Biltereyst, R. Maltby, & P. Meers (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to New Cinema History (pp. 1-12). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666051

Bloom, P. J. (2020). Pre-cinema as paradigm and collection at the Getty Research Institute. Early Popular Visual Culture, 18(1), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2020.1763636

Braun, M., & Whitcombe, E. (1999). Marey, Muybridge, and Londe: The photography of pathological locomotion. History of Photography, 23(3), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.1999.10443324

Cholodenko, A. (2024). The animation of cinema. Semiotic Review, 10. https://doi.org/10.71743/s3p4x084

Claudet, A. (1865). XXXVI. On moving photographic figures, illustrating some phenomena of vision connected with the combination of the stereoscope and the phenakistoscope by means of photography. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 30(203), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786446508643971

Das, S. (2023). The evolution of visual effects in cinema: A journey from practical effects to CGI. JETIR: Journal of Emergıng Technologies and Innovative Research, 10(11), 303-309. Retrieved from https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2311442.pdf

Denson, S., & Leyda, J. (2016). Post-cinema. Theorizing 21st-century film. Falmer: Reframe Books.

Duffy, L. (2024). Making up for temps perdu in Physiological and Literary Discourse: Helmholtz, Marey, Proust. French Studies, 78(3), 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1093/fs/knae069

Dulac, N., & Gaudreault, A. (2004). Heads or Tails: The Emergence of a New Cultural Series, from the Phenakisticope to the Cinematograph (T. Barnard, Trans.). InVisible Culture, (8), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.47761/494a02f6.b2544b15

Dulac, N., & Gaudreault, A. (2006). La circularité et la répétitivité au cœur de l’attraction: les jouets optiques et l’émergence d’une nouvelle série culturelle. 1895. Mille huit cent quatre-vingt-quinze. Revue de L'association Française de Recherche sur L'histoire du Cinéma, (50), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.4000/1895.1282 [in French].

Ebbrecht-Hartmann, T., Stiassny, N., & Henig, L. (2023). Digital visual history: historiographic curation using digital technologies. Rethinking History, 27(2), 159-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2023.2181534

Eder, J. (1945). XXVII. The stroboscope and other early devices showing the illusion of movement in pictures. In History of Photography (pp. 495-501). New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/eder91430-070

Faubel, C. (2015). ZoOHPraxiscope, re-inventing the Zoopraxiscope with an overhead projector. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 7(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.7559/citarj.v7i1.145

Fresko, D. (2013). Muybridge’s Magic Lantern. Animation, 8(1), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847712473804

Gaines, J. M. (2023). Antonia Dickson: The kineto-phonograph and the telephony of the future. Early Popular Visual Culture, 21(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2023.2160293

Galifret, Y. (2006). Visual persistence and cinema?. Comptes rendus biologies, 329(5-6), 369-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2006.03.008

Gallego, G., Delbrück, T., Orchard, G., Bartolozzi, C., Taba, B., Censi, A., ... & Scaramuzza, D. (2020). Event-based vision: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(1), 154-180. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3008413

Gentet, P., Joung, J., Gentet, Y., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Design and implementation of a full-color holographic thaumatrope. In Practical Holography XXXIII: Displays, Materials, and Applications (Vol. 10944, pp. 81-85). San Francisco: SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2507609

Gilbert, R. (2020). The concrete zoetrope: engaging students in pre-cinema with an eye towards the future. Early Popular Visual Culture, 18(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2020.1761601

Goodwin, J. (1978). Eisenstein: Ideology and intellectual cinema. Quarterly Review of Film & Video, 3(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509207809391392

Grasnick, A. (2021). Basics of virtual reality. Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64201-6

Hadjiafxendi, K., & Plunkett, J. (2022). Play, craft, design, feel: engaging students and the public with Victorian culture. In K. A. Morrison (Ed.), Victorian Culture and Experiential Learning: Historical Encounters in the Classroom (pp. 101-120). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93791-1_7

Haenni, S. (2014). Intellectual promiscuity: Cultural history in the age of the cinema, the network, and the database. New German Critique, 41(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-2680846

Hoffmann, C. (2013). Superpositions: Ludwig Mach and Étienne-Jules Marey’s studies in streamline photography. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.08.002

Hwang, K. (2021). The artist's creativity and the plastic surgeon's creativity. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(8), e845-e846. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007894

Kontou, T., Mills, V., & Menke, R. (2022). Zoetrope, phenakistiscope, thaumatrope. In R. Menke (Ed.), Victorian Material Culture (pp. 269-277). London: Routledge.

Kuwahara, N., & Fujimoto, T. (2022). Development of digitalization of video device in the pre-cinema era. In H. Selvaraj, & T. Fujimoto (Eds.), Applied Systemic Studies. International Conference on Systems Engineering (ICSEng 2022) Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, (Vol. 611, pp. 232-241). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27470-1_22

Lipton, L. (2021a). Chronophotographers: Janssen, Marey, and Demenÿ. In The Cinema in Flux: The Evolution of Motion Picture Technology from the Magic Lantern to the Digital Era (pp. 93-102). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0951-4_11

Lipton, L. (2021b). Muybridge and Anschütz. . In The Cinema in Flux: The Evolution of Motion Picture Technology from the Magic Lantern to the Digital Era (pp. 85-91). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0951-4_10

Lipton, L. (2021c). Plateau Invents the Phenakistoscope. In The Cinema in Flux: The Evolution of Motion Picture Technology from the Magic Lantern to the Digital Era (pp. 43-50). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0951-4_4

Lipton, L. (2021d). The Kinetoscope: Projection’s Inspiration. In The Cinema in Flux: The Evolution of Motion Picture Technology from the Magic Lantern to the Digital Era (pp. 127-136). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0951-4_14

Lipton, L. (2021e). The Zoëtrope and the Praxinoscope. In The Cinema in Flux: The Evolution of Motion Picture Technology from the Magic Lantern to the Digital Era (pp. 55-60). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0951-4_6

Marey, É.-J. (1882, April 22). Le fusil photographique. La Nature, (464), 326-330. Retrieved from https://cnum.cnam.fr/pgi/fpage.php?4KY28.18/330/60/432/6/420 [in French].

Muybridge, E. (1887a). Muybridge, Eadweard, 1830-1904., & University of Pennsylvania. (1887). Two deer jumping. Collotype after Eadweard Muybridge, 1887. Wellcome Collection. Retrieved from https://jstor.org/stable/community.36630453

Muybridge, E. (1887b). Muybridge, Eadweard, 1830-1904., & University of Pennsylvania. (1887). A bald eagle flying. Collotype after Eadweard Muybridge, 1887. Wellcome Collection. Retrieved from https://jstor.org/stable/community.36631317

Muybridge, E. (1887c). Muybridge, Eadweard, 1830-1904., & University of Pennsylvania. (1887). A cat running. Collotype after Eadweard Muybridge, 1887. Wellcome Collection. Retrieved from https://jstor.org/stable/community.36631284

Muybridge, E., (1878) The Horse in motion. "Sallie Gardner," owned by Leland Stanford; running at a 1:40 gait over the Palo Alto track, 19th June/ Muybridge. California Palo Alto, 1878. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/item/97502309/

Oiva, M., Mukhina, K., Zemaityte, V., Karjus, A., Tamm, M., Ohm, T., ... & Schich, M. (2024). A framework for the analysis of historical newsreels. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 530. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02886-w

Olson, A. I. (2016). Muybridge in the Parlor. Journal of American Studies, 50(1), 81-104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875815000018

Papacosta, P. (2018). Muybridge, the Galloping Horse and revealed Errors in Art. International Journal of Art and Art History, 6(1), 15-26. Retrieved from https://ijaah.thebrpi.org/journals/ijaah/Vol_6_No_1_June_2018/2.pdf

Peng, A. I. (2024). Social Changes in America: The Silent Cinema Frontier and Women Pioneers. Humanities, 13(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/h13010003

Pylypchuk, O. Ya., Strelko О. H., Korobchenko, A. A., & Pylypchuk, O. O. (2022). Alfred Russel Wallace about harmony in the Universe (To the 120th anniversary of his work "Man’s Place in the Universe"). Space Science and Technology, 28(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2022.02.061

Pylypchuk, О. Ya., Strelko, О. H., & Pylypchuk, О. O. (2021). Academician V. I. Vernadsky about the originality of life in Space (To the 100th anniversary of his work “The Beginning and Eternity of Life”). Space Science and Technology, 27(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2021.02.085 [in Ukrainian].

Riede, F., Johannsen, N. N., Högberg, A., Nowell, A., & Lombard, M. (2018). The role of play objects and object play in human cognitive evolution and innovation. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 27(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21555

Roberti, V., & Peruzzi, G. (2023). The Helmholtz legacy in color metrics: Schrödinger’s color theory. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 77(6), 615-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-023-00317-x

Roget, P. M. (1825). V. Explanation of an Optical Deception in the Appearance of the Spokes of a Wheel Seen through Vertical Apertures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (115), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1825.0007

Rossell, D. (2004). The use and mis-use of technological argument in media history. In H. Segeberg (Ed.), Die Medien und ihre Technik. Theorien, Modelle, Geschichte (pp. 221–234). Marburg: Schüren https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14213

Sadoul, G. (1946). Histoire générale du Cinema. Paris: Denoël [in French].

Sayfutdinova, A. M., & Galiaskarova, D. R. (2022). The evolution of decorative art: From street performance to cinematic virtual worlds. In S. V. Klyuev, N. I. Vatin, & L. S. Sabitov (Eds.), International Scientific Conference Industrial and Civil Construction 2022 (ISCICC 2022). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (Vol. 436, pp. 252-259). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44432-6_31

Schwenk, K., & Wagner, G. P. (2010). Visualizing vertebrates: new methods in functional morphology. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, 313(5), 241-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.608

Şerban, S. (2021). How we see motion pictures. Illusion and reality in the perception of the cinematographic image. Journal of Communication and Behavioural Sciences, 2(1), 35-64.

Smiley, M. (2023). The mechanical against objectivity: Industrialism and inoperativity in Eadweard Muybridge’s Animal Locomotion (1887). History of Photography, 47(3), 203-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2024.2384778

Strelko, O., & Pylypchuk, O. Ya. (2021). Apollon Konstantinovich Krivoshein: The last railway minister of the Russian Empire in the era of Emperor Alexander III. West Bohemian Historical Review, 11(1), 1–23. Retrieved from http://wbhr.cz/images/issues/WBHR_2021_1.pdf

Tissandier, G. (1882, November 4). Le praxinoscope à projection. La Nature, (492), 357–358. Retrieved from https://cnum.cnam.fr/pgi/fpage.php?4KY28.19/361/100/432/8/420

Tissandier, G. (1892, Juillet 23). Le Théâtre Optique de M. Reynaud. La Nature, (999), 127–128. Retrieved from https://cnum.cnam.fr/pgi/fpage.php?4KY28.39/131/70/536/5/420 [in French].

Türkmen, A. (2024). Representation of space in pre-cinema moving image devices. Journal of Arts, 7(3), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.31566/arts.2391

Turquety, B. (2015). Forms of machines, forms of movement. In M. Tortajada, & F. Albera (Eds.). Cine-Dispositives: Essays in Epistemology Across Media, (pp. 275-298). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Retrieved from https://umontreal.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/9c403361-3de8-43c9-8a84-a9a42f3d0fad/content

Utterson, A. (2020). Persistent Images: Encountering Film History in Contemporary Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474440745

Vaniuha, L., Kyreia, M., Lemishka, N., Spolska, O., & Patron, I. (2024). History of the evolution of cinema in the context of considering the stages of development of science and technology. The first steps to the birth of cinema. History of Science and Technology, 14(2), 513-538. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2024-14-2-513-538

Vaniuha, L., Markovych, M., Hryhoruk , N., Matviishyn, S., & Toporivska, Y. (2023). The history of the creation, formation and development of the Museum of Theater, Music and Cinema Arts of Ukraine. History of Science and Technology, 13(1), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2023-13-1-78-100

Veras, C. (2022). Reanimating the history and the forgotten characteristics of the zoetrope. Animation, 17(1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/17468477221085412

Wade, N. J. (2004). Toying with Science. Perception, 33(9), 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3309ed

Wade, N. J. (2016). Capturing motion and depth before cinematography. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 25(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2015.1070029

Walker, E., Turner, C. J., & Oyekan, J. (2024). Software-defined event-based camera and vision algorithms for digitizing highly dynamic manufacturing tasks. In IET Conference Proceedings CP885 (Vol. 2024, No. 11, pp. 61-66). Stevenage, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.3486

Weinberg, C. B., Otten, C., Orbach, B., McKenzie, J., Gil, R., Chisholm, D. C., & Basuroy, S. (2021). Technological change and managerial challenges in the movie theater industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45, 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09374-z


Abstract views: 811
PDF Downloads: 411
Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Toporivska, Y., Dyadyukh-Bogatko, N., Belinska, L., Balan, N., & Patsaliuk, L. (2025). The movement into cinema as a stage in the cinema development. History of Science and Technology, 15(1), 239-275. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2025-15-1-239-275